Next up conversation hearts math activities. I'm certain you've got a box of these or something similar lying around.
-Have your kid sort them into colors, then see how many there are of each color. This year we really talked about most, least, equal (2 colors had the same amount), etc.
-Take a piece of paper and draw hearts (trace around a cookie cutter or draw free hand), circles, or divide into a simple grid. Then write numbers in each shape. Do whatever numbers you like, but remember they add up, be certain you've got enough heart candies or whatever you are using as a counter.
-Do some patterning with the hearts (again be certain you have enough of each color in the pattern). You can begin the pattern and then have your little one finish it up or if they are ready (Brady was this year) have them create their own pattern. I did have to help her see that having only one purple didn't lend itself well to making a pattern.
After all that hard work- eat up (if you like those nasty conversation hearts)!
After all that hard work- eat up (if you like those nasty conversation hearts)!
We've also done lots of activities with heart shaped stickers. I wrote the letters of the alphabet randomly on some sheets of heart stickers and then had her place them in alphabetical order. I wrote the numbers 1-30 on some foam heart stickers and had her place them in numerical order. We are working on recognizing 11-30. Those seem to be tricky so I helped with these and I could see her little brain working as we went. It helped that I had the numbers on 3 different colored hearts so that they made a pattern as well.
Love her little look of concentration in the picture! I love candy conversation hearts! Love eating them and reading the messages, so silly. Haven't had any yet this year, time is running out!
ReplyDeleteYou better get some tomorrow or what and get them on clearance Monday! I do love reading them. Now, they're all modern and say things like "Test Me"hahaha. They do make some tart and tangy ones that I like.
ReplyDeleteThat should have said wait- obviously!
ReplyDelete